On February 28, Bloomberg reported on a study co-authored by New York University Stern School of Business Professor Rosa Abrantes-Metz and Albert Metz, a managing director at the rating agency Moody’s Investors Service. In their not yet published draft research paper, the two authors claim that “The structure of the benchmark is certainly conducive to collusion and manipulation, and the empirical data are consistent with price artificiality” and that “It is likely that co-operation between participants may be occurring”. We have come to the conclusion that their findings could be explained and are not a valid proof of manipulation of the pm London gold fixing.
- METALS MORNING VIEW 05/12: Metal prices consolidate while broader markets show weakness
- METALS MORNING VIEW 04/12: Metals prices rebound again after Monday’s rally ran into selling
- METALS MORNING VIEW 03/12: Metals react positively to G20 trade developments
- METALS MORNING VIEW 30/11: Base metals prices firm despite disappointing China data
- METALS MORNING VIEW 29/11: Metals prices consolidate gains after Fed comments, focus shifts to G20